Welcome back!

This time we will be diving into a debate topic, not something I am documenting about. I do wish to do more of such articles in the future, so brace yourself.

In this debate, I propose that authoritarian regimes should be banned from bidding to host major international sporting events, such as the FIFA World Cup and the Olympic Games.

When we think of international sporting events, we usually think of the excitement and joy that come with them, the cultural exchange they showcase, and the economic benefits they generate. However, hosting a major international sporting event is a complicated process that requires a ton of resources, expertise, and commitment.
Hosting a major international sporting event requires not only financial resources but also organizational skills, technical know-how, and logistical capacity. It involves many factors which include building or upgrading facilities, ensuring security, transportation, accommodation, and other logistics for athletes, officials, media, and spectators who come from all around the globe.

The bidding process for such events is no less complex. Event organizers have to show their ability to meet the requirements and expectations of hosting such an event. They have to showcase their vision, their strategy, their resources, and many other factors that will ensure their right to host the event. They have to compete with other bidders who may offer better proposals.

In this context, the question of whether authoritarian regimes should be allowed to bid for such events becomes essential. As we know, authoritarian regimes are those where the concentration of power is in the hands of a few elites who are not accountable to the people, and who often use force, propaganda, and censorship to maintain their grip on power.

The first reason why authoritarian regimes should not be allowed to bid for international sporting events is that they lack legitimacy. In a democratic society, the leaders are elected by the people, and they represent the will and interests of the people who live under them. This gives them the right to speak on behalf of their country and to represent it on international platforms. On the other hand, in an authoritarian regime, the leader is not someone elected by the people, and they often rule by fear and intimidation. This makes it difficult for them to gain the trust and respect of other countries when hosting such events.

The second reason why authoritarian regimes should not be allowed to bid for international sporting events is that they pose a risk to the safety and security of participants and spectators. Authoritarian regimes often have a poor record of human rights, freedom of expression, etc. They may use the event as an excuse to spy on foreigners or to showcase their military or police power. This could lead to incidents of violence and could tarnish the reputation of the event and the host country.

After all, I have said, I firmly believe that authoritarian regimes should not be allowed to bid for major international sporting events. Such events are meant to celebrate human excellence, promote goodwill, and invite international cooperation. They should not be used as a propaganda tool. By banning authoritarian regimes from bidding for such events, we can ensure that they are held in countries that respect human rights, democracy, and the rule of law and that they contribute to the betterment of humanity as a whole.